NPR--Secret 'Watch List' Reveals Failure To Curb Toxic Air

NPR and the Center For Public Integrity team up for a four part series "Poison Places: Toxic Air, Neglected Communities" kicking it off with the release of an EPA "secret watch list:"

Pollution violations at more than 1,600 plants across the country were serious enough that the government believes they require urgent action, according to an analysis of EPA data by NPR and the Center for Public Integrity. Yet nearly 300 of those facilities have been considered "high priority violators" of the Clean Air Act by the Environmental Protection Agency for at least a decade.
About a quarter of those 1,600 violators are on an internal EPA "watch list," which the agency has kept secret until now.

The report cites a "lack of modern equipment and rules" and a "system of self-reporting" as major contributors to the rampant, serial pollution that's continuing to threaten communities and lives. They're exactly right, but industry propaganda spins out fear and misinformation to the masses by claiming that increased regulation and equipment updating will result in a "loss of jobs and unnecessary rate hikes."

What these industry disinformation spin masters leave off is the documented increase in costs to Americans for health care, higher mortality rates and the overall increasing toll on human health from less stringent regulation and oversight. These industry apologists would have us believe that profits by the polluters trump citizen's rights to clean communities.

That idea came about during the Bush era EPA which instituted a steady decrease in the value of a human life as a means to institute less regulation.

It was a big lie then and it still is now. 

view full searchable map »

Incredulously, only one Alabama company wound up on the serial offender list: Chemical Lime Company of Alabama in Calera.

Region 4 EPA recently released their 'answers' to the residents of North Birmingham in response to the Walter Energy contamination (Deadly Deception). The 'answers' and explanations from the EPA are couched in generalities and offer no real solutions to the resident's plight.

On the heels of media attention and the environmental justice meeting that occurred in Birmingham this past July, it's our postilion that no one at that meeting heard a word. Inside sources tell us that the meeting was never supposed to be public, and it only went public because of pressure from the right people in positions of influence.

The EPA acts schizophrenic at times, listens to too many voices, contradicts itself and occasionally does things that defy logic unless you're a mental patient. This may be one of those instances. Why do they seem more concerned with keeping secrets and remaining less than transparent in releasing information that serves the public good? There's no excuse for that, but we're interested to hear their explanations.

Allowing these toxic titans to self-police and self-report is inexcusable. So is misleading the public by keeping internal 'secrets' designed to protect corporate America at the expense of citizen America.
*additional reading: "Many Americans Left Behind in the Quest for Cleaner Air"
Air monitoring results N. Birmingham--locations to view data

 Subscribe in a reader

Shelby County Reporter and Conflicts of Interest?

***Note: some links in this post will link to previous postings due to the archived stories being unceremoniously removed by the SCR upon the recent relaunch of its website.

We have covered the Shelby County Reporter and its ostensibly continued biased reporting in previous posts, and will now go more in depth and present what we believe, are valid journalistic and editorial ethics issues that deny the citizens of Shelby County, Alabama fair and accurate reporting.

The Editor of this paper, Tim Prince, also serves as president of the South Shelby Chamber of Commerce (SSCC). On the SSCC website is a "Letter from the President" which includes the Articles of Incorporation:

The South Shelby Chamber of Commerce was founded and incorporated on October 20, 1993. The original Articles of Incorporation read that, “the object of this Organization is for the purpose of promoting economic programs designed to strengthen and expand the income potential of all business within the trade area; promoting programs of civic, social and cultural nature which are designed to increase the functional and aesthetic values of the community; and discovering and correcting abuses which prevent the promotion of business expansion and community growth.” Those same ideals are still pursued 15 years later, as the Chamber and its members continue to promote and enhance the economic vitality of South Shelby County.

"Discovering and correcting abuses which prevent the promotion of business expansion and community growth."

Exactly what does that mean? Does that include citizens that organize against a proposed business for their community because they do not feel it is in keeping with the "functional and aesthetic values of the community?"

"Correcting abuses." Does that mean violating a town's zoning ordinances and running rough shod over the procedures to change said ordinances because following proper procedure is an "abuse" or impediment to "business expansion and growth?"

(One thing it doesn't mean is a valid explanation for the hiring of the Chair of the Shelby County Commission, Lindsey Allison who is a family law attorney, to represent WRQ in the zoning lawsuit filed against the City of Vincent. That move has impropriety written all over it due to her position, influence and field of law expertise.)

Just because something prevents the promotion of business expansion doesn’t mean it’s inherently bad; quite the contrary--  we have zoning and environmental and health and safety codes that “interfere” with pure greed and expansion, for good and necessary reasons.  Which is why most communities have rules about where you can put slaughterhouses, cemeteries, quarries, coal mines, gravel pits, landfills and waste-disposal plants, and less obnoxious industries that rely on toxic or dangerous materials (like mercury and cyanide) which are perfectly useful and necessary industrial materials, but require careful monitoring and mindful application.

 

One man’s “business expansion” is another man’s front yard facing an auto salvage yard as a new “neighbor.”  “Slow growth” and “no growth” are perfectly valid concepts which many communities embrace.  Other communities confuse minimum-wage jobs and toxic workplace environments with “expansion,” and invite noxious businesses into the area (usually in locations where there’s no visible impact on the wealthy and powerful).

 

“Discovering and correcting abuses” is another way of saying “eliminate all roadblocks created by anyone with environmental or safety issues, and marginalize or neutralize any person or organization who uses the law to slow down or stop unregulated expansion and growth-for-profit at any cost.”

The SSCC makes their position in being staunchly pro-business to a fault very clear; they have even used the words "aggressively promoting business" in other documents that discuss the SSCC  "ideals."

We will not fault any Chamber of Commerce for actively wanting to promote economic development within their communities--it is to be expected from those entities. But, it becomes a problem when that philosophy extends to what is supposed to be an objective public forum; the local newspaper.

The Chemical Lime plant/quarry that was championed in the SCR Editorial from 2007 has not been the boon for the City of Calera that *it was claimed it would be. Clearly, the paper was led to write such a favorable editorial by interests other than the citizens interests.

*(scroll under consent order)

Time after time we have seen stories published that exhibit bias regarding the Vincent, Alabama community and the WRQ Vincent Hills quarry  as we explained in previous postings. But it extends beyond bias and moves into the lack of accuracy in reporting on facts and figures presented in one recent story regarding Vincent's projected population growth that were just plain wrong.

We have also made note of the very restrictive TOS revisions by the paper in January 2010, that have been revised yet again with the "relaunch" of their "new web version" on August 10, 2010. Forum commentators must secure permission to post links to other stories from the originating authors/sites, which is beyond any stipulation we have seen in any TOS to date. By posting these links, without permission, the paper puts the poster in danger of copyright infringement by declaring that the poster is claiming the link as their own material.

Comments on all Vincent stories "disappeared" along with original stories, other comments were removed that allowed readers to obtain a differing point of view, such as is presented on this site, and all the archives became inaccessible with the recent relaunching of the web paper. It lends itself to the appearance of deliberate suppression of any other point of view that media outlets should encourage even if they disagree with them.

One of our fellow bloggers who enjoys 500,000 hits per week puts it this way:

"Overly restrictive TOS and the persistent removal of comments that challenge the newspaper/writer/subject are usually the created when pretentious people are upset and are too weak to compete on a level playing field in the arena of public opinion. It sends a clear signal to the community that if you disagree or take a hard line stance, then you are unwelcome in their arena of public debate. Stifling restrictions imposed by the controllers are implemented to make sure that no one strays too far from the established thoughts and ideals."

Notes and calendar records were obtained through an FOIA request from the office of Kristine Goddard, Planner II with the Shelby County Development Board, that revealed that White Rock Quarries "maintains a blog on the SCR website." If there is a logical explanation for that we would like to hear it, because the aggressive PR firm they hired and numerous spokespeople they also employ, in addition to access to other big media outlets, raises the question of why would they need to influence the public discussion boards, if that is indeed what they "maintained the blog" for.

And why would a public newspaper allow this to occur in the first place?

Newspapers should serve three basic functions for communities: watchdog, teacher and conscience. Those three things are impossible to achieve if the reader suspects there is something else behind particular news coverage other than journalistic standards. Journalists must strive to avoid impropriety and conflicts of interest as the basic tenets of ethical journalism because a newspaper's credibility is its most vital asset.

In this case, the SCR Editor is self-defined in his role as president of the SSCC to be a strong advocate for business expansion and promotion. How can the paper he serves as Editor for possibly be fair and objective in their coverage of negative aspects of the county businesses and industries that are of interest to the public? Isn't there an obvious conflict of interest between journalistic and business goals in this situation?

When Editors place themselves in the position of putting their overlapping financial objectives from one entity to their management objectives in another, it creates a muddled atmosphere that blurs the line between journalistic standards owed to the public and business obligations to their competing corporate interests.

Corporate ideals and the public interest are often not aligned in their philosophies and journalistic impartiality is all but impossible to achieve in this scenario. Advertising dollars add to this problem because news outlets have become so dependent on their revenue that they will sometimes "look the other way" and omit certain stories and facts that would upset specific corporate clients.

Although there are no compelling laws that govern the media's suggested ethics codes that are enforceable under the First Amendment, many news organizations have adopted them and strive to "seek the truth and report it." Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.

The Editor of the SCR should be promptly replaced because he has refused to disengage himself from these outside influences, and in doing so, he has lost all editorial credibility resulting from his position with the SSCC and their ideals.

This county has long labored under the delusion that the public figures rooted in Columbiana's power structure and special interests have the absolute right to control the news presented to the Shelby County residents. They would be wrong in that assumption and should be held accountable for their actions by the citizens of this county-- who deserve an honest, fair and accurate voice from their sole local media provider.

So say we the Opinion Board of the Vincent Alabama Confidential
**Update August 18**
We note that some past stories have made their way back onto the site, but you have to know "how to find" them. It will probably be chalked up to; "We are still working out the kinks in our new site." We thought of this too and took our own steps to document that what we saw at certain points in time.
Nice try though.

 

Chemical Lime Co. Calera, Alabama Consent Order from ADEM Public Notice June 23, 2010

PUBLIC NOTICE - 350

Alabama Department of Environmental Management

P O Box 301463 (Zip 36130-1463)

1400 Coliseum Boulevard (Zip 36110-2059)

Montgomery, Alabama

PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER

SHELBY COUNTY

Pursuant to the provisions of the Alabama Environmental Management Act, Ala. Code §§22-22A-1 to 22-22A-16 (2006 Rplc. Vol.), the Alabama Department of Environmental Management is proposing to issue a Consent Order to Chemical Lime Company (CLC), the owner/operator of the CLC O’Neal Plant, a lime manufacturing plant located in Calera, Alabama.

The order references three instances in which measured particulate matter (PM) emissions exceeded the allowable PM emissions rate for Kiln No. 1.

The Department is proposing a civil penalty in the amount of $120,000.00. The order, if issued, would require Chemical Lime Company to maintain compliance with the permitted PM emissions limits.

Interested persons may submit written comments, including request for a hearing, within 30 days of the publication date of this notice, to:

Alabama Department of Environmental Management

Attention: Ronald W. Gore, Chief of the Air Division

P.O. Box 301463

Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463

The comment period shall end at the close of business 30 days from the publication date of this notice. A copy of the proposed order is available on the ADEM web page at adem.alabama.gov or may be obtained by written request to the above address. A nominal fee for copying may be charged.

This notice is hereby given June 23, 2010, by authorization of the Alabama Department of Environmental Management.

Lance R. LeFleur

Director

#          #          # 


Let's talk about where this PUBLIC NOTICE was not found; conspicuously placed in the Shelby County Reporter newspaper, which would really allowed "interested persons" to take ADEMs "new director" Mr. LeFleur, up on his invitation to comment and to request a hearing.

Kind of defies the meaning of PUBLIC NOTICE does it not? Perhaps ADEM should qualify their definition of a PUBLIC NOTICE to really mean one you have to go and find only if you know where and when to look for it.

Now, with three days left before "time is up" according to ADEM, the chances to be heard are slim. We would like to ask the Shelby County Reporter why this was not published in their PUBLIC newspaper, so the local PUBLIC who it serves and that lives in that area of the county could have input on this?

Stephen Bradley lobbies for Chemical Lime, and was instrumental in getting them into Calera as their PR man, so perhaps he can tell the citizens of Calera why they were not informed of this PUBLIC NOTICE, since it is his client, and he had such high regard for the citizens and officials of Calera when he needed them to go along with the project.

Maybe he is too busy coming up with additional excuses as to why the 7,000,000.00 "World Class Sports Complex" has still not been built which Chemical Lime "promised" Calera.
SCRJuly2008SportsComplexDelayed 

In exchange for a favorable zoning ordinance of course.

We don't know why, but something about that "contract zoning" sounds vaguely familiar...Vincent, Alabama and WRQ maybe?

Some say that at times the "real story" is in the reader's comments sections, what the heck, let's see what the comments were on the above story shall we?

Posted by packing on August 1, 2008 at 10:45 p.m. 

Is this the Bradley that is not a Chemical Lime employee?
Is this the Edwards that works for Calera some, sells real estate some, found money to run for Commissioner some and sold certain properties to Chemical Lime but not others?   Just curious.   And by the way, since the land is now rezoned high-value commercial instead of farm land, how much more taxes is Chemical Lime paying Calera and Shelby County than when the property was zoned farm land?  Just curious.  Anybody know how much added revenue from the taxes for the land being valued as quarries now?   I don't know the answers to any of this, but I do wonder and article didn't say.

Posted by packing on August 1, 2008 at 11:01 p.m. 

Since Chemical Lime has been able to retain the $7 million for let's say a year and you picked a number, say a small one like you wouldn't get at the bank, maybe 2% what would that work out to for every year you could retain $7 million?  And what would it have worked out to if you used a realistic number, say like the prime rate or 5%?  2% rate gives you about $140,000 ($137,000), while just the prime rate of 5% would have been $350,000.  The longer you delay paying, the closer, business wise, it comes to not costing you a thing.  Or am I wrong in the way I'm thinking about average hard working person vs government vs deals vs big business?

A few more citizen opinions from March 2007:

SCRLettersToTheEditorChemicalLime 

 

What's Missing From the Geology/Hydrology Reports For WRQ

White Rock quarries has hired a number of "experts" to substantiate their proposal for the Vincent Hills quarry. From what we read there is more missing from their reports than is included in them, and the Town of Vincent and Shelby County have either failed to realize this or they don't want to; the latter of these two may be why they really continually resist an independent geologic and risk assessment study.
(Many thanks to our geologist friend for his contribution)
Some points we would like to address:

•  The Tom Joiner and Associates Report is a “virtual” hydrological assessment, and does not include field investigation, other than minimal monitoring well assessment; 13 wells over 886 acres is inadequate to fully assess groundwater fluctuations to adjacent areas under varying seasonal conditions.

• No attempt was made to determine the actual subsurface in the land area other than reliance on previous geologic studies and less than 17 reported borings, or to determine its significance and/or impact to the Subject Site and surrounding properties. GPR and Electric Resistivity Tomography (ERT) have not been used to accurately map what is under the soil. (The complete analytical results of these borings has yet to be released despite numerous requests)

•  No effort was expended to groundwater modeling to the local or regional aquifer, other than to cite references from previously published literature. No on-site dye tracing and analysis has been performed.

•  Information detailed in the hydrology/geology which was stated as “fact” is either conjectural and/or goes beyond the available evidence which is minimal; there is no existing statistical model in Vincent to compare it to.

In summary, these reports are deficient, and seek to minimize or negate the impacts to human health and the environment that the quarry’s development may pose. 
Based on the "evidence" presented in the WRQ reports and documents, we do not believe the report is adequate to address the expressed concerns.

What should be demanded:
In order for the Vincent Hills quarry to proceed in a manner which will minimize impacts, approval should be delayed until the following data can be provided and reviewed:

1. An accurate groundwater elevation map should be developed using available static water level elevations from the new (need to be established) and existing monitoring and water supply wells in the area.

This should encompass an area not less than 2 miles surrounding the proposed permit area, and any future areas intended for quarry development.

2. The means by which water management will be handled at the Site should be described in more detail. Monitoring wells should be accessible to the EPA for testing with no requisite restrictions or notification and test results should be beyond PH and turbidity, and include testing for high risk chemical contaminants such as benzene and petroleum by products. These reports should be made readily available to the public without censure and delay and not remain solely in the Vincent Water Board's control to disseminate when they deem appropriate.

3. Peak flow measurements should be made for the tributaries draining into Spring Creek both near the site and adjacent properties. These measurements will aid in developing a stormwater and sediment and erosion management plan that is based on site specific data, rather than conjecture or extrapolation.

4. Turbidity measurements should be made of all the Spring Creek tributaries that originate on and very near the WRQ site, including the unnamed tributaries that flow into Spring Creek. (ADEM recognizes that these exist.)

5. A dewatering test should be conducted to determine the effect of quarry dewatering on surrounding springs and wells. This test should include the installation of a sufficient number of extraction wells, capable of lowering the local water table to the proposed depth of quarrying.
Once a stable draw-down at the level of the quarry excavation is reached, the pumping should be continued at the appropriate rate for a minimum of 72 hours. All accessible wells and springs on the WRQ property, and within the 2 mile radius should be monitored for changes in water level, turbidity and flow.

6. A dye trace should be conducted to determine these tributaries of Spring Creek and the base flow conditions during the draw-down when water levels are at their lowest.  

If the WRQ quarrying activities are not carefully controlled and managed, a steady flow of sediment-laden water may be directed towards Spring Creek and its tributaries, particularly during storm events and subsequent flooding that may accompany heavy/prolonged rain events.
(**This has been a problem with Chemical Lime and Carmeuse lime production facilities ancillary to quarrying in Shelby County according to the ADEM files)

Even under conservative stormwater and sediment and erosion controls, turbid water is expected to flow to Spring Creek via its tributaries and the underground karst conduits. If Spring Creek is dried out by the quarry, then this source of water will recharge from the Coosa and bring the known contaminants of the river into the groundwater supplies.  This river has experienced a heavy PCB contamination.

To compound matters, it is doubtful that the settling and detention ponds planned for the WRQ Site will be able to retain more than a two-year storm, which we understand is the standard of practice design for SWM structures. 

Thus, if a 10-, 100-, or 500-year storm event occurs (at least two of which have occurred within the last 15 years regionally), and the impoundments overflow or their dikes are breached, these ponds may disgorge their sediment load into the tributaries feeding Spring Creek and the groundwater. 

This sediment would then clog the tributary channels, foul the Spring Creek bed near the tributary confluence, and increase turbidity to levels that may severely impact the entire stream’s environment. In addition, this sediment may also be swallowed into the epikarst, and find its way to whatever conduits drain the creek bed.



The overburden risk on the known karst terrain from the settlement ponds has not been addressed at all. Should failure occur, the contents of the sediment ponds will be rapidly drawn through the karst conduits and risk contaminating the entire water supply. These ponds are represented as "clean" when in fact they contain the quarry tailings; which are by-products of the mining operations.


Representation had been made that the quarry water "is so pure that many communities rely on the quarries for their community water supply." We have addressed that claim in a previous post and file this outlandish claim in the lies and damn lies pile along with most of what has been submitted as "rock solid facts" from WRQ.


Robert Fousek, yet another geologist "expert" who is really an industry insider, stated that Jim Hurley told him "to spare no expense in determining that this operation was safe to the community" in the last public meeting.


Put your money where your mouth is Mr. Hurley and do what you and your "experts" are well aware of and really should be done, NOW, not "once the quarry is operational."

Montevallo's Fight Against the Quarry 2005

Residents ready to fight quarry

"I think this is a fight we can win and justifiably so."

Those were the words of Alabaster Mayor David Frings during a May 17 meeting attended by some 400 people to oppose a proposed quarry in the vicinity of Meadow View Elementary School. The meeting, conducted by Alabaster city officials and hosted by Meadow View Elementary, was attended by elected officials and their representatives from city, county and state levels of government, a representative from the Shelby County Board of Education and a biologist from the University of Montevallo.

The quarry is proposed to be located in the vicinity of Smokey Road and Meadow View Elementary School.

According to Cam Ward, who serves as executive director of the Alabaster Industrial Development Board and as a Republican member of the state House of Representatives, a permit has been applied for with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) by Middle Tennessee Land Development Co. LLC. for a 233-acre site.

While Ward said the quarry would be surrounded by the city of Alabaster, he said it would actually be located in unincorporated Shelby County.

Representing the city of Alabaster were Mayor David Frings, council president Rick Walters, city administrator Tony Rivera and council members Mike Sherwood and Tommy Ryals. Representing Congressman Spencer Bachus was his legislative assistant Gilbert Johnston. He said Bachus is against the quarry and would be drafting a letter to ADEM stating his objection. Representing the University of Montevallo was Dr. T.M. "Mike" Hardig, associate professor of biology. Attending from the city of Montevallo were Mayor Sharon Anderson and council members Hollie Cost and Becky Cox-Rodgers.

Also in attendance were State Rep. Cam Ward, Shelby County Commissioner Jon Parker and Assistant Superintendent of Operations for Shelby County Schools Tom Ferguson. In announcing the meeting to oppose the quarry and calling upon concerned citizens from both inside and outside the corporate limits, Frings wrote, "Even though the proposed location (of the quarry) lies outside the city's jurisdiction, the mayor and city council of Alabaster have serious concerns about granting this permit due to adverse environmental impact it could cause the citizens of the area."

Frings disputed any notion the quarry represents the last reserve of limestone in Shelby County. Ryals said developer Robert Dow, whom he identified as a principal of the proposed quarry, has come before the Planning and Zoning Board of the city twice without ever mentioning a quarry or a road to a quarry. He said Dow wanted to extend the retail section for property near the location of the proposed quarry where a retail development, Lion's Gate, is also proposed.

In the proposed retail development, Ryals said, Dow shows a road with a cul-de-sac which connects to Highway 119. Ryals said it is the opinion of the city, however, that Dow wants the road for access to the quarry. Ryals said despite reported claims that Dow has access to Highway 119, the Planning and Zoning Board has not granted any such access. Ryals also said Dow was expected to come before the Planning and Zoning Board for a third time after press time last night.

Frings also said Dow had approached the Planning and Zoning Board about a shopping center near County Road 80, but action was delayed because it "did not seem right."
Frings told those gathered for the opposition meeting last week that to quarry limestone, water must be pumped from under the ground, which over a period of years will produce sinkholes in the surrounding areas.

He also spoke of the dire affects a quarry would have on surrounding wetlands. Frings stressed that the quarry cannot be defeated on feelings, or emotions, but on geologic hazards and environmental damage to the wetlands and species of life that exist there.

Ward stressed that keys to success include everyone who is opposed to the quarry sticking together. Jon Parker said he is opposed to the quarry but could not speak for the entire County Commission. He said he did not want a quarry in the middle of his district. 

Hardig said the quarry would mean the death of Ebenezer Swamp which includes a 65-acre preserve conserved by the University of Montevallo. But Hardig had even more concerns. "As a local botanist with a familiarity of the region, I can assure you that a limestone quarry at this site will have widespread and profound effects on the ecology of the region. It will adversely impact the local flora and fauna as well as the people that live in the area. "These effects will likely include: extirpation (destruction) of local plant and animal species due to loss of wetland habitat, higher average stream flow with more-frequent and more severe downstream flooding, increased downstream sedimentation, contamination of aquifer-supplied drinking water, loss of aquifer-supplied drinking water and accelerated sinkhole development in the surrounding highlands."

Hardig continued, "A quarry operation in southern Cahaba Valley will not only devastate the ecology of Spring Creek but will also affect the people living in the region. The southern Cahaba Valley is already home to many people, and new developments are going in almost daily; this is an area of explosive population growth. 
Quarry-associated sinkhole development will place financial burdens on homeowners and their insurers. Noise and dust produced by quarry operation will have a high nuisance value. Many homes are situated on the adjacent ridge lines, locations that will provide homeowners with unobstructed views of daily quarry operations. 
Downstream residents should expect more frequent flooding and higher flood levels during peak rain events. Three municipalities draw portions of their drinking water from the underlying aquifer by wells. 
Drinking water supplies could become contaminated during the quarry operations by spillage or dumping of petroleum products and chemicals." 

Hardig said those problems would increase the cost of water purification. "Further, if the groundwater level is lowered to a point below the well bottoms they will go dry," he warned.
When asked if the city could restrict access to the property such as denying an access road, Sherwood said, "You bet we are going to do that."

Frings said the proposed quarry expects to be in operation for 42 years and he said that means several hundred acres being involved as opposed to a reported initial proposal to use 44 acres. Frings said of the public meeting, "All we're doing is letting you know where we are. We haven't done anything yet. But we're getting ready to. We need your support ... your help."

Landowners understood the potential damage the quarry could bring. "I don't want my property value to go down or fall into a hole," one woman said. And she asked, "Who's going to be responsible?"

Frings said that is the reason city officials were working with county and most state officials to get the information to homeowners in the area. Frings said the fact that various levels of government are involved in the fight will have an affect. And he said of voiced public concern, "I think it will definitely help make (ADEM) hold a public hearing."

As Meadow View Elementary School is also located on Smokey Road, Ferguson said, "We (the school board) have concerns." He said blasting at existing quarries is already shaking the foundations of a school in Alabaster.

In addition to the shaking and the noise, Ferguson expressed concern about traffic in the area and air quality. Sherwood said if the quarry is approved, it could be in operation "as early as next year." Dow was contacted for comment but did not return telephone calls.
#       #        #

The contrast between Montevallo and Vincent is shocking.
What you are mostly reading are the opinions of elected officials, school board officials and experts (Mayor Frings is a biologist himself).
Even Senator Bachus was involved in this resistance and wrote a letter to ADEM.
49 miles away from Vincent, in the same county and what a tremendous difference in thinking and action.

Senator Bachus, The Shelby County Board of Education and County Commissioner Jon Parker have ignored the pleas of Vincent parents to help their school children.

Why have they done this?

Their fight is not over yet.....


According to Kristine Goddard, Shelby County Planner II, who admitted to one of the "higher ups" in the No Quarry group in the presence of two other witnesses: "They are still trying to work that out, it is not resolved yet."

What she meant was (and she was pressed to define her words) was that Shelby County was still pushing for the quarry.

It is a great deal for Columbiana's coffers; all of the money and none of the hassle such as lawsuits, liability for damage, water treatment facilities (the cities must construct and maintain those), etc.


All the tax revenue and none of the hassles. These cities assume all the risks and are solely responsible for what happens (Calera and Alabaster are prime examples) and the "Godfathers in Columbiana" get paid on the backs of these communities.

Sounds exactly like the Mafia; you got problems, tough, you pay me no matter what.

Lies and Damn Lies

This was from the latest White Rock Quarries ad,  June 16, 2010 The Daily Home,  put out by WRQ in the local paper under the heading of :

White Rock's Vincent Hills Quarry.

What it will and will not do for Vincent.

Item 6 0f 7:

IT WILL NOT POLLUTE THE WATER.

Limestone quarries pose no environmental threat to groundwater quality. In fact, it is common for cities to seek out quarry water for their drinking water because of its purity.

Remember, White Rock never had a water citation--or even environmental citation of any kind.

Really?


What about the benzene issues in Florida? "5-12 times the EPA levels after two WRQ blasts in monitoring well # 1." (See link to Miami New Times story "Poisoned well" to the right)


What about the EPA reports for WRQ showing "no data returned" in most fields? What about the lack of EPA inspections? The state agency, DERM and the local boards and commissioners in those areas are documented as being corrupt and not willing to take on the "powerful rock mining interests." John Renfrow of DERM, even admits in news stories that he was aware the mining companies, WRQ was one of them, were operating with expired permits or NO permits.
(links to the right)


What about the established science that quarries do degrade ground water quality in numerous USGS and industry publications?


What about the by-products of petroleum products from blasting and machinery that are recognized in these same publications that ground water degradation and contamination from quarrying is a "continuing ground water management problem in sensitive environmental area such as karst terrains?"


What about the city of Calera, Alabama and their water quality degradation that is well-documented from the nearby quarries?


Most communities turn to the quarries for their water supply not because of "its purity", but because the quarry has intercepted ground flow conduits and robbed the communities of their water supply. Or they have contaminated it so badly (also in Calera and Alabaster) that the cities are forced to find alternative supplies. Since the quarries have pirated their water, there is often no where else to turn but to the very entity that took it in the first place.

That results in the communities having to spend millions to build and maintain a water treatment facility (Calera is still in trouble with this now.) 


Vincent Mayor Ray McAllister says; "All we have to do is turn a few valves and we can hook up to New London or Shelby County's water system." What he does not admit, that an insider does, is that under periods of drought neither system will be able to handle the increased demand from having Vincent on its systems.

Item 4

IT WILL NOT OPERATE LIKE A DUSTY OLD TECHNOLOGY QUARRY

The latest and best dust suppression technologies will be used, including covered conveyors and transfer points and wet suppression of fugitive dust. The main crusher will be located 80 feet below ground level to reduce dust and noise.

We will give the aggregate industry credit for trying to improve it's technologies and methods.


That said, drive through Calera and Alabaster on any particular day and see an example of the "latest and best technologies" and their effects on their surrounding areas.


To quote an Alabama Department of Industrial Relations Inspector; "I drive all over the state in my inspections and when I get into the Highway 25 area and see the dust all over everything, I ask myself; Do you think there are air violations going on here?"


Looking back at the proposal from the Martin Marietta quarry which opened in 2002, they used the same language regarding dust as WRQ is parroting now. Still, there is dust everywhere. One man in Alabaster we recently talked to, who lives one mile from a quarry, says he has dust problems at that distance.


What WRQ knows is that Shelby County and ADEM will not hold their "feet to the fire" and make them follow through on these "good neighbor promises."


WRQ knows this and once again they are deliberately and intentionally trying to mislead the public with this ad. Despite Mr. Hurley's recent proclamations of; "We have never tried to mislead you, never tried to twist the facts to boost our argument, or confuse the issue with misleading facts or information."


It's not just lies, but "rock solid" damn lies.

“People Want ADEM to be an Omnipotent Power”

This was a response from Chief of the Air Division at ADEM, Ron Gore, in response to property values, noise/truck traffic and environmental issues in the Montevallo quarry public hearing 2005.
Mr. Gore said; "Those issues are not covered by us."


From the story:
Gore said by state law, all ADEM can be concerned about is that the air and water leaving the facility meet standards. He said if an applicant can show that it can meet those standards, it is entitled to the permit.
Gore said if a court ruled in favor of the UM and the UM Foundation, then Middle Tennessee could not operate the quarry, but it would not invalidate the permit.
 SCRDecember2005ADEMGrantsPermitstoTannerGroup 

If ADEM is not concerned with with noise, blasting, environmental and sinkhole issues exactly what are they concerned with? The name of the agency has "environmental management" as part of its title, yet they refuse to acknowledge real issues that have everything to do with protecting Alabama's environment. Instead they hide behind "Best Management Practices" submitted by industries and cite those as the reason to issue permits.

These industries are well aware of this and exploit it to their full advantage: "If we put it on paper we will be "good neighbors" then they will have to issue permits." ADEMs self-imposed impotence ensures there will be no challenge to them, so they don't get heat from the Alabama legislature for upsetting the special interests that have Montgomery bought and paid for.

ADEM seems more concerned with collecting permitting fees above all else. Their water standards are archaic at best, and their enforcements do little to stop repeat offenders. Is this why they allow violations to continue, to add more monies to their coffers? It is certainly more profitable to continue fining entities that are serial offenders than to take strong steps to ensure that they will remain in compliance.

Since the inception of the agency in 1982,  it has been rife with corruption, malfeasance, conflicts of interest (i.e. Anita Archie who lobbied for the Business Council of Alabama) and a resistance to truly protect Alabama's environment and her citizens.

Archie's job description, posted on the Business Council's Web site, describes Archie and her staff as "your daily eyes and ears whenever and wherever public policy that affects your business bottom line is being made." 

Nice.  The fox watches the hen house.
StateEnvironmentalHeadSees"NoConflictofInterest"
BhamNewsCommentaryNotAppropriateforArchie 

In Talladega, Alabama just six months ago, ADEM refused to allow a public hearing on the ongoing battle against the waste water treatment plant citing a technicality:
 A memorandum between ADEM Air Division employees Scott Sanders and Wes Thornhill published on the ADEM Web site stated Sanders explained to Curtis over the telephone that the petition was not directly related to matters listed in the consent order, which was the failure to properly install and operate a scrubber and basin cover at REEF.

Since the petition was not related to the consent order, the approximately 1,800 signatures were not considered. The submitted comments that did not directly relate to the consent order were also not considered when determining if any changes should be made to the consent order, the memorandum stated.

ADEMDeniesTalladegaResidentsRequestForHearing2010 

The Talladega story is yet another prime example of how much you can do wrong and continue to operate with ADEM.

So are all the lime production plants in Alabaster, Calera and Sylacauga that operate with quarries. Those files will be posted on this site soon. What is happening in this county is almost criminal and it is past time Shelby Countians knew what they are living with.

Columbiana and the power structure that employs a stranglehold on this county has a lot of things to answer to.

We have little faith that any real change will ever come to Alabama to bring about sorely needed environmental reform on its own, it has to start with the citizens voices banding together and being heard.


We urge all Alabamians to speak loudly each and every chance they can, especially about the current pending quarry in Vincent. 


ADEM has vast authority, it could be said their capability borders on omnipotence, but clearly Mr. Gore echoes their real position; do as little as possible to keep the violation money rolling in.
(**Editors note: We have it on good authority that the fight over the quarry in Montevallo is continuing. More will be reported on that as information becomes available.)

A Sense of Purpose

Do you ever have days where you feel like you are led to places and people for reasons that had nothing to do with what your original agenda was when you set out?


It's almost like your original purpose had another purpose.


We set out today to help a friend that needed something they were not able to get for themselves. It led us to people we did not know who had something we needed.


Information to help our cause in Vincent.

We met a man today who lives in Alabaster, Alabama one mile from the  Martin Marietta Quarry. When asked what that was like he said; "It's awful. Especially in the spring. There is more activity at the quarry and dust is all over our place."

This man supplies health supplies, medical equipment and similar products to patients in their homes. He told us that as bad as it was for him and his wife, he had a patient he supplied equipment to who was much worse off. We asked him if he could tell us about it without violating the patient's personal privacy by revealing his name.


He agreed and this is what he said; "Our patient is 30 years old and we supply him with oxygen equipment, but he is also on a ventilator at night. He worked at Chemical Lime in Alabaster and about two months ago something really bad happened to him and some other workers. They were told to go out and clean something, but they didn't have their respirators and hazmat equipment. They didn't want to go and do it without the proper protective equipment they were required to wear, but the bosses told them to do it anyway." he said.


"They told the guys to wrap their t-shirts around their faces and go do their job."


The supervisors know this is against safety protocols, but obviously did not care. This seems to be a pattern with Chemical Lime. 


He went on to say what happened to the men, in particular their patient: "He (the patient) was burned from his face, down his throat and into his lungs so deeply from inhaling the lime dust that had been processed  that it has ruined him. He has been in and out of ICU at the local hospital and a nurse we know that works on that floor said he won't live to see 40."


A 30 year old man for all intents and purposes "murdered" by the company for failing to follow protocol. The other men suffered similar fates.


This case is in court and the company is trying to get the men to settle rather than go before a jury. We hope they do not settle and take their case as far as they can.

But the real question is: Why has this incident not been reported on in the press? We looked in the ADEM files and on the MSHA website and found nothing on this incident. If Columbiana knows are they covering for the company?


This happens far too often not only to workers, but to the communities that also breathe these toxins. In particular our children.


In Shelby County, schools that are near the quarries, are assaulted by Chemical Lime on a regular basis as the "number two polluter" to their schools.
(USA Today Special Report "Smokestack Effect, Toxic Schools" March 2010, link to the right)

This is another story that is absent form the local press.


We have file after file from ADEM e-file records on this company in Shelby County and they are habitual in their violations. ADEM is habitual in not inspecting them and making them comply. They fine them, which is profit for ADEM, but do not force them into effective compliance.

In Vincent, we are continually told that the quarry and it's ancillary businesses (Chemical Lime is a viable possible candidate for a WRQ ancillary business since Stephen Bradley, WRQ PR Rep lobbies for CL) will have "no adverse effects on the Town."


The elementary school is 4500 ft. from the quarry.


Chemical Lime is the "number two polluter" in the Calera and Alabaster schools near quarries.

"Wrap your t-shirts around your faces and go do your jobs." 

Hearing this today reaffirms our sense of purpose with this blog; Shelby County must be exposed and held accountable for what it allows industry to do to its residents. 
(**Editors note: We will check the courthouse filing on this case and attempt to reach the individual in this story. More will be posted as we find it on this.)

Environmental Group Places Coosa River Among Nation's Endangered, June 2010

#10 Coosa River Alabama

 Threat: Hydropower dams

 The Coosa River is a cultural icon of the South and home to an astounding variety of rare and unique fish, snails, and mussels. The construction of seven large hydropower dams in the mid 1900’s turned the river into a series of reservoirs and caused the largest mass extinction of aquatic species in U.S. history.

But there is still an opportunity to save some of the Coosa’s remaining natural heritage for future generations. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must insist on strong protections for the river’s endangered wildlife in the license that will allow Alabama Power to operate these dams for the next 50 years. The Coosa will serve as a test as to whether federal agencies are committed to environmentally sustainable hydropower operations.

PDF file link:

AmericanRivers2010MostEndangeredRivers

Contact Information:

American Rivers: Matt Rice,

(803) 771-7206,

mrice@americanrivers.org

Alabama Rivers Alliance:

Mitch Reid, (205) 322-6395

mreid@alabamarivers.org

World Wildlife Fund: Judy Takats

(615) 279-1814,

judy.takats@wwfus.org

**Thanks to the June 2, 2010 edition of the Birmingham News for publishing this. 

“The threats facing this year’s rivers are more pressing than ever, from gas drilling that could pollute the drinking water of millions of people, to the construction of costly and unnecessary new dams, to outdated flood management that threatens public safety,” said Rebecca Wodder, president of American Rivers.

Rivers are chosen based on several factors, including a pending major decision on proposed action, the significance of the threat to communities and the degree the proposed action would exacerbate or alleviate stresses, said the release:

 Coosa named on endangered river list - Birmingham Business Journal

We would like to add quarries, pipelines, waste water treatment plants and heavy industry in Shelby County to the list of threats to the Coosa.

Shelby County is in NON COMPLIANCE STATUS on their SWM (Storm Water Management, link to the right) by EPA federal audit 2009. This has NOT BEEN RESOLVED YET according to Senior Enforcement Officer, EPA Region 4, Chris Plymale.

That should trigger an automatic moratorium on all new permits until it is remedied.

The county performs their "model of cost effective Storm Water Management" as quoted by Stephen Bradley (WRQ PR Rep) on an "annual budget of 45,000 and two part-time employees." The population of the county is over 175,000 and their are 167 heavy industries in Shelby County.

(This from BARD, who gutted the Jefferson County SWMA now also under federal scrutiny)

There are five quarries in the county, numerous cement, asphalt, lime production, building materials, etc. industries in this county. All of them have numerous violations according to the ADEM files, and some of these violations occur under storm flooding conditions. From those sites they make it into the Coosa River, it's tributaries (Buxahatchee Creek has been hit extremely hard) and into our ground water.

Our drinking water.

But let's go ahead and force a massive quarry on the residents of Vincent, less than a mile from this river. Let's give them a SWM permit (even though we cannot handle what we have) and allow more pollutants into the Coosa. While we are at it, allow the quarry to establish parameters and access to their monitoring wells.

This is not at all a "fine idea for Alabamians." 

This river cannot endure another massive assault, Governor Riley.

Neither can Vincent, lest we forget the Alabama Plating Company Superfund cleanup.

Quarry History Lessons from Dr. Jack Bridges 2009

An excellent column by Dr. Bridges that deserves to be seen again, lest we forget....

By Jack Bridges / Guest Columnist
Published Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Vincent residents curious about limestone quarries as neighbors could take a tour of Central Alabama’s limestone quarries trail. Most of it is right here in Shelby County. A quick look around would answer many questions about living alongside a quarry.

Begin the tour just east of Montevallo on Alabama Highway 25. Drive west past the limestone operations.

You can’t miss the piles of spoil and the puffs of smoke from the chimneys. Head back on 25 toward Calera. Pause or drive slowly (but watch out for the rock- hauling trucks; a sight-seer could get overrun.

Check out the chimneys and the landscape, as well as the finish on the cars parked along the way.

Go on to Calera, then take U.S. 31 north toward Birmingham. You are right in the midst of the best part of the trail. All along the way you pass quarries and crusher plants and cement plants. Watch out for the tankers carrying cement and 22- wheel dump truck trailer rigs carrying various sizes of crushed stone.

One of the trail highlights comes at Saginaw. Take a quick side trip on Shelby County 26 toward Columbiana. That will take you past the new and expanded quarry of the old Longview Lime operations.

Go slow and you can see. The company has put up fencing and a big berm along the road with shrubs and trees to hide the works. Then you cross a bridge over the quarry’s sunken road for the rock haulers, and that gives a quick view to the left of the vast old hole in the ground, evidently with pumps still running, and a very informative look at the current digging operations.

Back on U.S. 31, turn toward Birmingham. In another mile or so, you’ll come to the manufacturing end of the limestone operation at the edge of the quarry. There is a good view of the kilns and furnaces for making cement, and the loading areas and the puffing smoke stacks and the lime dust on the trees and cars.

Stay on U.S. 31 for a while. Traffic gets a bit congested, but in a growing part of Alabaster, there is another quarry plant puffing out grey lime dust.

You can end your old- fashioned Sunday drive experience by retracing the route there and heading on home. But if you make the trip, you will know better what quarries are like. And you might stop along the way and ask some folks what sort of neighbors quarries make.

Dr. Jack Bridges, who lives near Shelby, spent years living near a quarry in his youth.

We spent some time going through the newspaper archives and found that in almost every instance, these quarry and lime plants bribe their way in.

One place they didn't get their way was Montevallo, but that did not stop ADEM from permitting the proposed quarry while a lawsuit was pending. They even went so far as to say' "Even if the quarry isn't operating, we won't withdraw their permits."

If the schools in this county are in such dire need, why the hell isn't Columbiana doing more to help them? Why do they insist on sentencing these kids to living with these behemoths that pollute everything nearby, especially our children?

Google maps will show you how close the schools are to these polluters.

EPA records will show what they do.

What irony.

The Long Hot Summer of 2007

In the heat of another sweltering Alabama summer mysterious things began to happen in Vincent, Alabama that would change it forever.

Strangers began to appear on the doorsteps of friends and neighbors offering unusually large sums of money for their farms.

In the beginning of this, with mostly familiar country folk in the parts, these strangers were not welcomed upon their unannounced arrivals and intent to have what had always been these people's homes for most of them. They were raised on the land, so were their parents and so on. Those ties run deep and are not quick to unbind themselves. Folks were leery of these outsiders and their "ideas."

"What are you going to do with it if I sell it to you?" was the question in their minds and on their lips. The answers were vague and short; "Agricultural purposes, I will give you twice or more what it is worth."

Money is in short supply around these parts and what these strangers were offering was too tempting to close the gate on, even if it did seem "not quite right" and out of keeping with everyday life in this small rural town.

Many of these land owners thought if it stayed agricultural, it wouldn't be so bad to sell their land, after all that was what they said wasn't it? "Agricultural purposes." Which to them meant, soybeans, corn, cotton and possibly timber.

That made the guilt of selling "home" a bit easier. So did the big money and snake oil sales talk by the outsiders.

When they made their way around to the Greene place it was a different story.

Robbie Green enjoyed a position on the local Zoning Board and was likely privy to inside information on who these strangers were. They were not strangers at all, but anticipated arrivals and appearing to act shrewd, she held out on them hoping they would "sweeten" their offer for her place and her Father who lived close by.

It worked better than a ten dollar bill in a dollar game and paid off with the highest price for any of the land sold.

No sooner had the ink dried on the checks, she resigned her position on the Zoning Board, gathered up Papa, who had a nice fat check himself in the deal, waved goodbye to her brother in law, who was soon to be the next Mayor and lit out for another county.

Questions and suspicion followed her like her own shadow. She proclaimed her innocence to everyone and defended herself with a predictable stance; "I didn't know what they were going to do with my land, and we weren't the first to sell you know. I made them a high price and I didn't really think they were going to take me up on it."

Nobody ever bought that load of fertilizer, not for a minute they didn't. Most folks here who have been around fertilizer all their life and seen it scattered on fields far and wide, here, there and over yonder said that was the biggest load of it they will ever see.

It's the beginning of another long hot summer, again, now in 2010 and getting hotter every day that rolls by here in small town Alabama.

No Benefit For Vincent & Why

We live in unique geology in most of Shelby County, karst terrain that is made up of limestone, dolomite and shale that is intertwined with underground springs and rivers.

Vincent relies on ground wells, literally Mother Earth, for its city water supply.

Our farmland is beautiful and rich as a result of this geology and is prone to sinkholes as well because of it.

The underground springs and rivers hold up our farmlands and keep our entire area from becoming one giant sinkhole, such as what happened in Dry Valley, Montevallo, Alabama in 1972 (49 miles from Vincent) as the result of massive dewatering from a nearby quarry.

The largest sinkhole in US history occurred there measuring 425 ft. across and over 150 ft. deep.

It was even named the "Golly Hole" by the man who found it and "December Giant" by geologists that came and studied it.

Withdrawing massive amounts of groundwater in this type of terrain results in increased sinkholes and greater subsidience (earth movement/collapse) because the land no longer has the support the groundwater provides.

4000 sinkholes have formed in this county from mining and massive dewatering since the 1970s according to the USGS. 1700 additional sinkholes have been recorded in the same Alabaster/Calera/Montevallo area within 2 miles of mining operations.

Shelby County is referred to as the "sinkhole capital of Alabama" for good reason.

This is a problem in an area that already has the risk of sinkholes because:
1. The Colonial pipeline running through it that supplies the eastern seaboard
2. Gas and petroleum lines running through the quarry property
3. Close proximity to the Coosa River (a major waterway), within a mile of the quarry property
4. Proximity to our schools, Elementary 4500 ft., Middle/High approx. 6000 ft.
5. A thrust fault line running slightly to the west of Vincent
6. Spring Creek an untested (by the EPA or ADEM) tributary of the Coosa River very close to the quarry property
7. Excavation to exceed 400 ft. in depth, well below our water table and the depth of the nearby river
8. Reliance of residents on the river loop and surrounding areas on wells
9. Lack of a city sewer system and the great number of septic tanks

The cone of depression (COD) will widen as the quarry goes deeper during operations and will cause wells to foul and or go dry as most wells in this area do not exceed 150 ft. Septic tanks are at risk of rupture from sinkholes, subsidience and perhaps blasting shock waves.

As the COD widens, all water will be pulled towards the quarry and put it at real danger of pulling the river in on it. The flood plain area is contiguous to the property. If they do pull the river in on them, it could be catastrophic depending far down they have gone and how much area would flood before it could be contained to some extent.

This city is not capable of inspecting and enforcing the quarry, no one has the expertise and knowledge to know what to look for. The county is under EPA federal audit for it's non compliance in storm water management.
2009 EPA 34 page document link within article from Alabama River Alliance website and appears at the right:

In the NY Times link at right, all of Shelby Counties' water inspection reporting seems to "cease" in 2006.

The county is not doing their job, ADEM is not doing their job, the EMC who oversees ADEM has failed to supervise and the EPA is also "asleep at the wheel".

Theoretically, we feel we have no oversight with this issue.

This is a very large quarry at 886 acres and with that comes heavy machinery and trucks, diesel storage tanks (no one has mentioned them in any proposals), chemicals used in quarrying operations (also no mention if those and what they are) and the accompanying businesses that are always with quarries such as:
1. Lime production plants
2. Cement Plants
3. Asphalt plants
4. Construction and steel fabricators

In our county, these industries are located with almost every operating quarry and Chemical Lime, Carmeuse Lime and Lafarge North America are persistent and notorious violators according to the EPA records. Carmeuse and LaFarge merged earlier this year into one entity.

Carmeuse and Chemical Lime are Stephen Bradley's clients. Martin Marietta Aggregates is also a client of Mr. Bradley's and operates two quarries in this county.

White Rock Quarries is saying they will ship "95% of the product by rail". Those rail lines run within a few hundred yards of our schools, an added insult to the children of our area.

The quarry claims it will use "wet suppression systems for all operations and trucks entering and leaving the site" to control the dust. What happens when that dust dries or it rains? It runs off into our groundwater or is carried into the air by winds.

They first proposed 40 ft. berms surrounding the site, then lowered it to 20ft. on two sides. The Alabama Industrial Board mining reclamation section states; a "minimum of 50 ft. berms surrounding the site will be maintained throughout the operational period of any quarry".

Why would they "lower" the berm height on two sides? Is it an effort to make it so inhabitable for the River Loop residents that they will want to leave?

The River Loop population is predominantly black. Is this the same tactic used by the "Big Mules" in Alabama previously to take advantage of economically depressed areas comprised of mostly minority residents?

See the links at right on Black Belt "Big Mule" Coalition and "New Mules" keep kick alive in Alabama (Bard and big business carry on bad tradition in Alabama).

Alabama does not need to return to the times of yesterday, but it seems they have through BARD and corruptible politicians.

This quarry marched into town promising:
1. 125 jobs (well below the average workforce of any existing Alabama quarry)
2. Money to our schools (it will go to the county and be distributed, not directly to Vincent schools)
3. 10,000,000 in tax revenue (again to be distributed by the county, not directly to Vincent)
4. New rec center and bleachers to the Elementary school (perhaps to give them a better view of the "beautiful, modern quarry" right on top of them and get them out of the dust?)
5. A new senior center (we have a good one now, but you have got to get the older population on board don't you?)
6. Promises of being a "good neighbor" (straight out of the BARD "handbook")

Who really benefits from this quarry?
1. The county "power players" that are working behind the scenes from Columbiana
2. Alabama Power (also a BARD member and heavy polluter under EPA scrutiny) and other industries such as Chemical Lime, Bowater (Gaston) Steam Plant, etc. that rely on "scrubbers" to reduce their sulfuric emissions. Limestone and Dolomite are used in this process. The dirty little secret is the scrubbers do nothing to remove mercury and arsenic that is also a by product of their coal process.
3. Local officials that can have access to large sums of money from the quarry who already "keep" and "sporadically record" meetings and accounting.

Vincent will not benefit, it will be destroyed.

It will gain national notoriety if this quarry comes in for all the wrong reasons.

No one, it seems, is listening.....